I realize it’s not terribly fair to take one extreme incident and present as a fair representation of an entire movement, but I can’t let this one go without comment because it seems to encapsulate so much of the entitlement associated with the nationwide campus protests against Israel’s military action against Hamas, the terrorist group based in the Gaza Strip.
ICYMI, here’s what I wrote about it last week:
Peaceful protest: What’s acceptable?
As most of you probably know, one of the largest and most disruptive protests has been at New York’s Columbia University, where nearly 100 students were arrested Tuesday night after they took over Hamilton Hall. The students went beyond violating the administration’s orders to vacate the building, barricading themselves inside with overturned tables and breaking windows.
The coverage of the Columbia protests has been extensive, especially at CNN, which had three reporters and several camera crews on the scene. Not surprisingly, some of the most timely and insider-style coverage has come from the Columbia student newspaper, The Spectator, which broke the story that all classes and final exams will be remote for the remainder of the semester. As of this writing, commencement exercises slated for May 15 are still on. The Spectator’s editorial board has been rough on Columbia President Minouche Shafik, stopping just short of calling on her to resign.
But I digress. The video at the top of this page is a sight to behold. A Columbia protester, a doctoral student who was part of the group occupying Hamilton Hall, demanded the university provide food and water to her and her colleagues because anyone with a Columbia meal card was entitled to it. She suggested school administrators might want “students to die of dehydration and starvation” in occupied campus buildings. Um, you are free to leave the building and go to the dining commons.
A reporter noted the irony: “It seems like you’re saying, ‘We want to be revolutionaries, we want to take over this building, now would you please bring us some food’.” The doctoral student characterized her food order as “basic humanitarian aid.”
In other words, if you don’t give us munchies, you will have blood on your hands! Writers from The Onion would be hard-pressed to dream up a funnier tableau. And the protesters wonder why so many fail to take their cause seriously.
Ironically, these rebellions against authority ultimately bring about something most of the protesters don’t want to happen. They could wind up helping to put Donald Trump back in the White House.
Flashback to August 1968 when my family had just moved to the South Side of Chicago so that my father could attend grad school at the University of Chicago. The Democratic National Convention took place from August 23-29. It was plagued by anti-Vietnam War protests, many of them featuring violent confrontations between demonstrators, the Chicago Police and the Illinois National Guard. Hundreds of civilians and police were injured. I witnessed one nonviolent demonstration when I climbed a tree with friend.
The powerful televised images suggested that the Dems were so feckless that they could not even run a convention, to say nothing of running the country. With Sen. Robert F. Kennedy dead, Hubert Humphrey emerged as the scarred nominee to run against former Republican Vice President Richard Nixon, who ran on a campaign to restore law and order. Even with segregationist George Wallace on the ballot as an independent candidate, Nixon eked out a popular-vote victory and won the electoral college 301-191-46. But even more telling is the fact that Nixon and Wallace combined for 57% of the popular vote
This year’s Democratic National Convention will be held in — you guessed it — Chicago. And you can bet the protesters will be out in full force 56 years later. I hope there are no violent confrontations but if there are, Donald Trump will come riding in on his white horse, promising to restore order.
For more reading on this matter, see Jeff Greenfield in Politico. Greenfield was a speech writer for RFK and had worked on his presidential campaign that year until Sirhan Sirhan put an end to it. Greenfield also noted that some of the biggest student anti-war protests took place that year at … Columbia.
Don’t Forget the Backlash to the '60s: Today’s campus chaos carries a grim warning for Biden
Meanwhile, as promised, a few photos from our trip. This time we stayed closer to our rental:
I agree with you about the irony and satire potential of the grad student spokesperson. That was classic. I wish I could find the first news item I read about her--it had a ink to her X page which described in excruciating detail her thesis: examining romantic literature of the 1800's through a Marxist lens. I'm truncating and paraphrasing, but it was a doozy.
Can you imagine what the folks in flyover country are thinking about this (mostly) coastal kerfluffle? I think there is a direct line between these incidents, how Biden has handled them (it took him 9 or 10 days to even speak about it ) and the election. The defacing of property is bad enough along with the destruction and mess left behind, but we saw that in 2020's "summer of love". What's far more egregious to me, and was not highlighted in your essay, is the incredible and overt antisemitism. It's scary,, it's ignorant, and it seems like history is repeating itself.
I read recently that liberals view society as a battle between the oppressed and oppressors. Conservatives view society as civilization v barbarians. I'm not sure where "mushy moderates" come down on that sliding scale, but I agree with you--the nation will speak in November, and it ain't lookin' good for Joe Biden.
Looks like your family had a wonderful trip to Seattle! Ellen looks happy and healthy. I always enjoy your photos!
That protester’s comments are infuriating.