Editor’s note: Evidently, Twitter and Substack are at war with one another, so for the time being I cannot embed tweets in my newsletters. My workaround is to screengrab the tweet and place it in the post as art. Then if you click on the image, it will link back to the original tweet and open it in anew window. This is especially useful if the tweets contain videos because it’s the only way you can view them. Thanks for your patience, dear readers.
Garland could go after Thomas, but I suspect they move in the same circles, so he won’t. Robert’s will do nothing, and Thomas does not have the dignity to resign. So we are left with what is surely becoming a less than a trustworthy SCOTUS. Imagine this happening in America!
Yes, Roberts exactly. Garland would only pursue criminal charges. It's a flaw in our system. We have three separate but co-equal branches of government, and two of them try not to step on the toes of the third. But something has to give. The high court cannot police itself.
Roberts- sorry. The autocorrect got ahead of me!
Garland could go after Thomas, but I suspect they move in the same circles, so he won’t. Robert’s will do nothing, and Thomas does not have the dignity to resign. So we are left with what is surely becoming a less than a trustworthy SCOTUS. Imagine this happening in America!
Yes, Roberts exactly. Garland would only pursue criminal charges. It's a flaw in our system. We have three separate but co-equal branches of government, and two of them try not to step on the toes of the third. But something has to give. The high court cannot police itself.